The official Allsvenskan league table, updated 24 hours after each match. Teams are ranked on points, and when two teams are level, goal difference separates them before goals scored.

Click a column heading to re-sort the table, and hover over a heading to see what the abbreviation means. The slider below the table sets which range of rounds is counted, so you can see how the table looked at a given point in the season, or how it would look if only part of it counted. The year at the top right switches season.

The same standings as the regular league table, but built on expected goals instead of actual ones. Every shot is valued by how often chances of that kind are scored; the total is the team’s xG, and xG together with xGA produce an expected points tally (xP).

Compare a team’s position here with the real table. A team ranked clearly higher in xP has played better than its results suggest and likely has more to come. A team ranked lower has overperformed, usually through clinical finishing or strong goalkeeping, which rarely holds up across a full season.

The league table calculated from home matches only. The columns are the same as in the regular table, but only points and goals from matches on a team’s own ground are counted.

The home table says something about how well a team uses its own pitch, its crowd and its familiarity with the surface. Compare it with the away table: a large gap between the two suggests a side heavily dependent on its environment, while similar figures usually mean a style of play that travels.

The league table calculated from away matches only, with the same columns as the regular table.

Away points have always been harder to earn, which makes this table a good measure of how robust a team is. A side ranked high here copes without home advantage and tends to hold up against the better teams. Compare with the home table to see how large a team’s home advantage actually is.

A table counting only a team’s five most recent matches – a form table. The columns are the same as in the regular league table, but everything older than the last five matches is stripped out.

Use it to see who is climbing and who has stalled. Bear in mind that five matches is a small sample: one heavy win or a run of tough opponents can swing a team’s position sharply. Read the form table alongside the regular table rather than instead of it.

A form table over the five most recent matches, built on expected goals rather than actual ones. Teams are ranked on expected points (xP) from the quality of the chances they have created and conceded.

Underlying performance moves more slowly than results, so this table picks up dips and upturns in form earlier than the results table does. A team high in xP but low in actual points over the last five matches has usually been unlucky and tends to catch up.

A form table over a team’s five most recent home matches. Only matches on its own ground count, and only the last five of those.

The table shows whether home form is holding up right now, which does not always follow the season as a whole. A team can have a strong home record across the year and still have lost its grip on its own ground in recent weeks – that shows here but not in the season totals.

A form table over a team’s five most recent away matches, calculated the same way as the home version.

Away form is often what decides whether a team can sustain a high league position. A side that has suddenly started taking points on the road has usually adjusted something in its defensive structure – compare with Defensive Solidity to see whether the numbers support that.

This table sets a team’s actual goals against its expected goals, in both directions. One half compares goals scored with xG, the other compares goals conceded with xGA, and the difference columns show over- or underperformance.

A plus in attack means the team has scored more than the chances warrant – sharp finishing, or luck. A minus in defence means it has conceded fewer than the chances warrant, which usually points to strong goalkeeping. Large gaps in either direction tend to shrink over time, which makes these columns useful for judging what is sustainable.

How efficiently a team turns its shots into goals. The table shows total shots, how many were on target and the share of shots that become non-penalty goals. Penalties are excluded, so the figure reflects play rather than penalty taking.

A high conversion rate can mean sharp finishers, but also that the team shoots from good positions rather than on spec. Read it alongside Chances Created and xG: a team with few shots and high conversion is selective, while a team with many shots and low conversion tends to shoot from too far out.

A team’s shot volume and accuracy: total shots, how many were on target, the share of shots on target and the average per match.

Shots on target is a blunt measure – a weak effort straight at the keeper counts the same as one in the top corner – but the volume says a lot about how often a team works its way into shooting positions. Combine it with xG to separate quantity from quality.

The number of clear scoring chances a team has created and conceded, plus the average per 90 minutes. Unlike shots, only situations judged to be genuine chances are counted.

Set chances created against goals scored, and chances conceded against goals allowed. Where they do not match, the team has either wasted opportunities or been unusually lucky – or unlucky. The measure sits closer to the run of play than shot counts and varies less between matches than goals do.

A breakdown of a team’s goals by how they were created: free-kick goals, goals from corners, penalties, headers, and goals from inside and outside the box. The categories overlap – a header from a corner counts in both.

The profile reveals how a team manufactures its goals. A high share from set pieces makes a side dangerous even in matches where open play does not click, while a team that scores almost exclusively inside the box has to work its way deep into the final third to threaten.

The same breakdown as for goals scored, but for the goals a team has conceded: free kicks, corners, penalties, headers and goals from inside and outside the box.

This is the most direct map of where a defensive weakness sits. A lot of headed or corner goals conceded points to problems defending set pieces, while many goals from outside the box suggests the team allows shooting space in front of its defence.

What a team’s substitutes contribute. The table shows goals scored by substitutes, their share of the team’s total goal output, and the xG, chances and shots they produce.

The figures say something about squad depth and about a manager’s ability to change matches from the bench. A team with a high share of substitute goals either has strong options or a deliberate plan to decide games late – compare with Stoppage Time Goals and Goals by Minute to see whether the pattern holds.

Goals scored and conceded in stoppage time, that is after the regulation 45 and 90 minutes, along with the difference between them.

Stoppage time is only a handful of minutes but decides a surprising number of matches. A clear plus here has usually earned a team several extra points across a season, while a clear minus tends to reflect lost concentration at the end of games. The sample is small, so read the numbers as a tendency rather than a trait.

A team’s goals scored spread across the phases of a match: three quarter-hour intervals per half, plus a total for each half. Stoppage time is included in the final interval before the break and before full time.

The distribution shows when a team is most dangerous. A late-match bias suggests good fitness, strong substitutes or a side that needs time to break opponents down. A cluster of early goals points instead to a team that starts at high tempo.

A team’s goals conceded spread across the same intervals as goals scored.

The pattern points to when a team is vulnerable. A clear spike right after the interval usually means poor starts to the second half, while a lot of goals conceded in the closing stages tends to come from fatigue, lost structure, or a team opening up to chase a result.

A team’s passing volume and accuracy: total passes, how many found a team-mate and the share completed.

High figures in both columns go with controlled possession, but pass completion says nothing about risk. A team that plays a lot of short balls backwards will post a high percentage without creating anything – set the numbers against Forward Passes and Progressive Passes to see whether the passing actually moves the team up the pitch.

Passes played forward, with volume, completions and completion rate.

Forward passes are harder than sideways or backwards balls, so the completion rate naturally sits below the overall passing percentage. A team with high volume and a low rate plays with risk and loses the ball often; a team with a high rate but low volume is secure but rarely threatening.

Passes that directly create a shooting opportunity for a team-mate, in totals and per 90 minutes, set against the team’s overall passing volume.

The measure captures the final, decisive pass regardless of whether the shot went in. A team with many key passes but few goals is creating openings without being rewarded – often a sign that the chances are there but the finishing is not.

Creative, often risky passes that break through the opponent’s lines and give the team a clear advantage. Shown as volume, completion rate and average per 90 minutes.

The volume says something about how boldly a team plays, the rate about how well it pulls it off. A low completion rate is normal – smart passes are difficult by definition, and a team that almost never fails at them is probably not attempting them often enough.

Passes that move the ball a significant distance closer to the opponent’s goal, with volume, completion rate and average per 90 minutes.

This is perhaps the single best measure of whether a team actually progresses or merely circulates the ball. Compare with Passes & Pass Percentage: a team with a high completion rate but few progressive passes has plenty of the ball without doing much with it.

A team’s direct play: long passes and through balls, separately and combined, per 90 minutes and relative to total passing volume.

High figures mean the team is happy to bypass midfield – either by design or because it is forced into it. Through balls are the sharper half of the measure: they break the defensive line and lead to chances far more often than a hopeful long ball does.

A team’s average possession per match, both as actual time on the ball and as a share of playing time.

Possession is a measure of style, not of quality – several successful teams deliberately give the ball away and counter. What matters is what a team does with it, so read the figure alongside Progressive Passes and Chances Created.

How much a team moves the ball with its feet rather than by passing. Accelerations with the ball are bursts of pace in possession; progressive runs are carries that take the ball significantly closer to goal. Both are shown as totals and per 90 minutes.

High figures mark teams that break pressure through dribbling and individual pace rather than through passing combinations. That is often effective against a high press, but it makes the team more dependent on the form of individual players.

A combined picture of a team’s defensive work: goals conceded, clean sheets, shots faced, and chances conceded in total and per match.

Clean sheets say something about how often the defence holds out completely, while chances conceded per match is the most stable measure of how much a team really gives away. A team with few goals conceded but many chances against is living dangerously and tends to be punished when goalkeeping form dips.